… brought to you by dermatophagia

Hi, my name is Martie and I’m a cuticle picker and nibbler.

Since at least early high school and maybe before, I have been a cuticle picker. This means this is a habit I’ve had for at least 20 years. I have made a few changes that have helped, most notably keeping neodymium magnets on me and using them to keep my hands busy. But these keep getting so dirty (people are curious when i’m playing with them and ask to try them, and then of course they drop them and this means they pick up anything remotely magnetic on the sidewalk, in the street, etc. (I wouldn’t have thought people were so butterfinger-y without this, but people constantly drop my magnets!)

magnet-bracelet

People who are not skin pickers and biters will NOT get this at all, but the truth is, there is something supremely satisfying about getting a “good bit” and being able to pull it out and then nibble it. I have not been able to find anything as uniquely satisfying. Sometimes there’s a special “crunch” that it gives that I haven’t been able to replicate!

Anyway, I am trying to more actively stop picking. I got a manicure for a wedding last month, and when that happened, I wasn’t biting. But now that the polish is growing out, my biting is back to being full on. I have tried twice to take it off, but since I got a gel manicure to try to make it last, it’s still lasting. And part of the reason I’m hesitating to go get it taken off and redone is that i KNOW they’re going to give me shit for the way my fingers look.

The crazy part, for me at least, is that I know these people are trying to help me. I also don’t really care much (OK, at all) about other people’s judgements. But even with these, I do not feel comfortable going in tomorrow to have this polish taken off and starting fresh with a manicure.

I took photos today to show where I am. Let’s take a look! You are either going to be completely grossed out because you can’t understand how anyone could do that to themself, OR you’re going to feel extremely relieved that you’re not the only one dealing with this (You’re not! I promise!).

win_20190701_17_01_55_pro-1

win_20190701_17_01_41_pro

My choice to go public with this was based in accountability. If y’all know I’m trying to do something, I’m more likely to do it so I can let you know. BUT now that I’m actually writing, I’m feeling more of a need to show fellow pickers that there are more of us out there, and most of us probably want to stop but aren’t doing it.

I want to stop, and I’m trying to do it. (One thing about me is that I don’t believe my self-worth is determined by my success at these ventures. So if I don’t succeed now, I’m not necessarily a failure, I just have to find a way that works for me).

Incremental change? OK! Wait, I changed my mind.

I started this out writing about how Obama justifying incremental change makes sense to me.

From WTF with Mark Maron: “Sometimes the task of the government is to make incremental improvements or try to steer the Ocean liner two degrees North or South so that 10 years from now, we’re in a very different place than we were. But, at the moment people may feel like we need a 50-degree turn. We don’t need a two degree turn. You say ‘well, if I turn 50 degrees, the whole ship turns. And you can’t turn 50 degrees.”

Here’s the whole thing.

BUT THEN I started thinking about things that need change immediately and that would be possible without knocking over the ship.

Some ideas:

  • campaign finance reform
  • treatment not punishment for mental illness and for drugs
  • end of solitary confinement (how is this not cruel and unusual?!)
  • stop letting banks create money out of nothing (I was VERY surprised to learn that 97% of money in the economy is created by banks!)
  • providing people with resources to live and contribute to society (if all of this money is made up by the banks, why can’t we use it to help those of us who are struggling to stay sheltered and eat nutritious foods?

The problem with these is that many of them are created by systems that are underneath and that depend on these in order to continue to exist (and create profits!). The prison-industrial complex is a good example. We can’t just provide treatment and not punishment, because then all the jobs created by prisons would disappear.

Maybe, but that this even needs to exist is an example of why it doesn’t work. If we were able to ensure that everyone could live, we could capitalize on human strengths and potential rather than trying to squeeze everything out of nothing. We know lots of jobs are outsourced and that manufacturing is too expensive here much of the time. Instead of blaming people for not trying hard enough to find work, or not allowing those who are working to actually live, it seems like this is a fantastic opportunity to shift towards a people-focused system rather than a profit-focused system.

We are people! We have gifts! Why can’t we celebrate and harness that?!

This is why I get so frustrated most days.

Why jaywalking is a pretty bad idea…

that's a nasty one!

that's a nasty one!

Usually, I’d leave it at that. You know, that whole “a picture is worth a thousand words” cliché. But no, not this time. That’s because, well, I was hit by a bike, and then something absolutely crazy happened.

I was walking with two friends on a Sunday morning to our weekly breakfast spot (mmm…eggs over!). I have had a thing about walking on diagonals, as the shortest distance is a straight line. So I lead my two friends into the line of danger, across a busy street. They hesitate in the middle, as there was clearly traffic coming. But, for some dumb reason, I think i can make it. WRONG! SMASH! I get knocked off my feet by a bicycle. It turns out there were not one, but two bikers who were affected by my stupidity. So I get up from the ground, a walking mess of tears (some of this is from the account of my dear friends). One of the guys involved was so nice about it; he realized it was an accident and felt bad because I was clearly shaken up (and apologetic about what happened!). The other guy, though, was 100% dick. He started off by yelling “I could sue you for this!” and then proceeded to yell various profanities at me. I did the right thing and apologized, and told him that I realize that it was stupid and my fault, but, through my tears, tried to convey that at least we just had some bruises. It turns out the dick had a small cut on his chin. Everyone knows cuts on your face bleed a lot! So, it looked a lot worse than it actually was. The dick yelled at my friend, who had been fumbling through her purse for a tissue, “You better go get me a !@#$*! tissue!” and kept on yelling at me  (note: she did not go get said tissue, thank you). He tells me his bike is busted (the fork was turned, and it took about 10 seconds to put it back in place). He tells me that I’m a #$@#(*& idiot for the hundredth time (I agree, sir, but c’mon!). And then we try to gather up and get on our way. Or, on the opposite of our way, as we decided to just go back to my house. So we turn the corner off the main road (after crossing diligently at the crosswalk when the white walker was illuminated) and they are still reassuring me that accidents happen. And then suddenly the dick rides up behind us. He gets one foot off his bicycle, and before I know it, he tries to rub his bloody tissue on my face. He said something, maybe along the lines of “Here, I think you deserve this!” Luckily, my reflexes were spot on and I was able to move his hand out of the way.

In short: Don’t jaywalk. If you’re going to do it, be smart!

And if you’re going to get hit by a bike, please don’t let it be this dick!

Dr. Seuss’s genius stolen by the anti-abortionists!

It wasn’t until recently that I actually read (well, was read) Dr. Seuss’s Horton Hears a Who. Now, in case you need a refresher, the book (first it was a book!) is about Horton the elephant, who spends the book trying to save the creatures that live on a speck of dust. The idea that runs throughout the story is “A person’s a person, no matter how small.”

Now, as someone who is a firm believer in the dignity of all people, tolerance, and equality, and who, by the way, measures a startling 5’0″, this quote really struck me.

I did some Internet searching and found that Dr. Seuss had a print to go along with this idea (and many other beautiful pieces of art, by the way):

They’ve Proved They Are Persons No Matter How Small

They’ve Proved They Are Persons No Matter How Small

BUT while I was finding all of these gems, I also found something troubling: Lots of anti-abortion groups have taken to using the phrase “A person’s a person no matter how small” to justify their views. Now, I don’t want to get entirely entrenched in the abortion debate, but I do want to point out (however controversially) that there is no clear consensus in the scientific or medical world about when “life” begins or when a person becomes a person.

For the record, Theodor Seuss Geisel (yup, he had a real name) wrote this book in 1954, well before 1973 when abortion was legalized and this became a common issue in American society. But, while we’re on the subject, Geisel and his wife were liberal Democrats who believed in women’s rights. Usually, women’s rights involve a woman’s right to make decisions about her own body, which is a foundation of the pro-choice argument.

But wait, 1954! That sounds familiar. That was the year of the landmark decision Brown vs. Board of Education of Topeka, KS, which declared that separate was not equal, at least not in the area of education. It makes sense that a liberal children’s author would incorporate this idea into his work, and here we see it (lots of Dr. Seuss books include commentary on equality and tolerance (many featuring Horton again, and his own website states that “Throughout Seuss’s books, Horton represents loyalty, equality and faithfulness.”), as well as the environment (see: The Lorax) and other important issues).

It is a shame that Seuss’s message of tolerance, celebrating the idea that we should appreciate everyone, despite whatever differences we may all have (at the time, the focus may have been on skin color, though I bet Seuss would support many types of tolerance), has been overshadowed by the pro-lifers.

Let’s take it back! “A person’s a person, no matter how small” should be used once again to remind us to respect everyone, despite our differences!

(With thanks to http://www.prochoicetexas.org/news/headlines/200803191.shtml)

(And finally, I can’t help but take this a little bit too literally and direct you to the idea of heightism.)

fine, fine?

Oh, the homonym. Words that look the same. Oh, the homophone. Words that sound the same. Words that look and sound the same, are they homophononyms? Perhaps they should be.

The reason that I’m talking about these is because I have been thinking about the word “fine” lately. I find it kind of ridiculous that if something is just “fine,” it’s not that great, but if you’re using your “fine” china, you want to be reallllly careful. How does that work? So then I went on to think of different uses of the word “fine:”

Fine print. Fine hair. Fine toothed comb. Pay a fine. She’s lookin’ fine. Fine motor skills. Oh, fine!

Those are only off the top of my head. Where is the link bringing all of these “fine”s together? I’m not sure! I decided to take a look at the OED, which has three noun listings, one adjective listing, and three verb listings for the word. I haven’t even heard of some of these! Apparently, “fine” has something to do with ending, as in “to bring to fine.” This makes sense, because of the whole “final” thing. But that’s not what’s important right now. I guess I’m really hung up on the way that “fine” means really awesome, but it also means just mediocre. Further investigation in the OED says that it can be used ironically. Is this the basis of the so-so “fine” that’s ubiquitous today?

Perhaps that will have to do for now. If you have more information, please enlighten me/us!

Where’s Carl?!

Tonight’s long-awaited blog post was supposed to feature a(nother) video from “Ellen.” It was going to be a clip of this guy who Ellen nicknamed “Carl” who stood straight as a statue during the dancing part of the show. However, I am not able to find a clip of this! This isn’t like me, but it is kind of late. I wanted to include something, so here is what I find interesting about all this: Carl is so famous that he made it on Wikipedia! In the entry on “The Ellen DeGeneres Show,” it says:

Ellen has also helped many non-famous people attain their 15 minutes of fame by having them as guests on the show. Guests in this role have included intelligent children, the owner of a small shop called “Mostly Moose and More”, a flea market owner who raps in his commercials, and a male audience member who refused to dance, named Carl by Ellen based on the way he looks, while his real name is Jim. Most recently there has been Lisa Barnum, who attempted to step on Ellen’s coffee table aggravating her back injury; in several later episodes Ellen jokingly blames Lisa for her back injury.

 You can find too many ridiculous things on YouTube (if it wasn’t so late, I would have found something to put as a link there, so link is TBA). What you can’t find is clips from network television shows after enough time has passed for someone-responsible-for-getting-rid-of-copyright-infringements to take it down. Where does that leave people like me who want to share the goodness that is clips like this one? It leaves my audience video-less! The video is funny, but you’ll have to take my word for it for now. Because I know that you are now desperately craving some kind of entertaining video, allow me to present the laughing-at-tearing-paper-baby:

I encourage you to spend more some time watching laughing baby videos. It’s gotta be good for the soul!